Case Study — Manufacturing & Industry 4.0
How an Auto Components Manufacturer Reduced WIP Loss by 35% and Gained Full Production Visibility with RFID
The Challenge
This Tier 1 auto components supplier manufactures precision-engineered parts for three major OEMs in India. Operating 3 shifts across 4 production lines, the plant produces 12,000 components daily with extremely tight quality and traceability requirements from their OEM customers.
The core challenge was Work-In-Progress (WIP) visibility. With components moving through 8–12 machining stages, there was no reliable way to know the real-time location of work orders on the shop floor. Components would frequently get misplaced between stages, mixing up batches from different work orders — causing rework, scrap, and OEM shipment delays.
- 3.2% WIP loss rate — components misplaced, mixed with wrong batches, or scrapped due to traceability gaps
- No real-time visibility into which work order was at which machining stage
- OEM customer audit trail requirements not being met (IATF 16949 compliance risk)
- Cycle time analysis impossible — no timestamp data for individual components at each stage
- Tool management manual — calibrated tools being used beyond their service life undetected
The Solution
Identium deployed an on-metal UHF RFID system using industrial-grade hard tags that could withstand the harsh machining environment — coolant spray, metal chips, and high temperatures at certain stations.
- Industrial on-metal UHF RFID tags (on work pallets)
- 8x Fixed readers at machining stage entry/exit
- 2x Handheld readers for exception handling
- RFID-enabled tool tags (critical calibrated tools)
- Fixed readers at dispatch dock
- SAP PP module (production planning)
- IATF 16949 traceability reports
- OEE dashboard (per-line, per-shift)
- Tool management calibration tracking
- Automated OEM shipment ASN generation
Technical Considerations
Manufacturing environments present unique RFID challenges that require specific product selection:
- Metal interference: Standard RFID tags detune on metal pallets. Solution: on-metal tags with ferrite layer that maintains read performance when mounted directly on steel.
- Coolant & cutting fluid: IP67-rated tags selected to withstand continuous coolant exposure. Tags tested at 85°C coolant temperature.
- RF interference from CNC machines: Site survey identified interference zones. Fixed readers positioned to avoid null zones; directional antennas used at two stations.
- Read speed at line speed: Pallets move at 1.2 m/s on conveyors. Reader dwell time verified at >99.8% read rate during testing.
Results After 12 Months
"The RFID system gave us something we never had before — real-time visibility into exactly where every work order is on the shop floor. Our OEM customer auditors were impressed by the traceability data. We've since expanded the system to our second plant."— Plant Manager, Tier 1 Auto Components Supplier, Chakan
Products Used in This Deployment
| Product | Quantity | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial On-Metal UHF RFID Tag | 800 units | Mounted on work pallets, reusable |
| UHF Fixed Reader (4-port, industrial) | 8 units | Stage entry/exit and dispatch dock |
| UHF Handheld Reader (rugged) | 2 units | Exception handling, manual scans |
| Micro UHF RFID Tool Tags | 150 units | Calibrated tool identification and tracking |
RFID for Your Factory Floor?
Get a manufacturing-specific RFID proposal. We handle harsh environments — metal, coolant, high temp, EMI. IATF 16949 and ISO compliance documentation available.
Request Manufacturing Proposal Manufacturing RFID SolutionsFrequently Asked Questions
What was tracked in this manufacturing deployment?
Work-in-progress carriers across four production lines at an auto components plant in Pune, plus tooling and fixtures held in the tool crib.
What results were achieved?
WIP loss fell 35%, OEE improved 12%, and per-unit cycle time became visible station by station instead of being estimated from shift totals.
Which tags survived the plant environment?
On-metal UHF hard tags for carriers and fixtures, and high-temperature tags rated for the heat-treatment stage. Standard paper labels were ruled out during the pilot.
How was the data used day to day?
Reader events were pushed into the plant MES, so supervisors saw live station dwell times and could act on bottlenecks in the same shift rather than in the next weekly review.
How long did it take to see results?
The pilot ran on one line for six weeks before roll-out. Measurable OEE improvement appeared within the first full month of plant-wide operation.
Related reading & products
Guides: RFID for manufacturing & WIP tracking · RFID asset tracking guide
Shop: on metal rfid tags · rfid pcb ceramic tags
Next step: request free samples or see bulk & OEM pricing.
Explore more RFID solutions
By industry: RFID for warehouse & logistics · RFID for retail & apparel inventory · RFID for healthcare & hospitals · RFID for events & venues · RFID for manufacturing & Industry 4.0 · RFID for government & smart cities · RFID for jewellery inventory
Compare & decide: UHF vs HF RFID tags · Fixed vs handheld RFID readers · RFID vs barcode · Passive UHF vs active RFID · Why BIS certification matters
Proof: Warehouse case study: 90% faster counts · Retail case study: 99.5% stock accuracy
Next step: run the ROI calculator · request free samples · bulk & OEM pricing